Skip to content

Meeting recording

Is It Legal to Record a Meeting? Consent Rules by State and Country

By Updated 10 min readLaws checked against the linked statutes, court decisions and regulator guidance in October 2026

Is it legal to record a meeting? Consent rules by place. A This meeting is being recorded prompt with OK and Leave, noting the notetaker shows in the participant list

Quick answer: Usually yes, as long as the right people agree. US federal law and most states let you record a meeting you take part in with your own consent, but about a dozen states, including California, Florida and Pennsylvania, need everyone's. The UK, the EU, India, Canada and Australia add their own rules. The safe habit everywhere: say you are recording at the start and get a clear yes.

On this page

Disclosure: This guide is published by Lynkk, which makes an AI note taker. It is general information, not legal advice. Laws change and the facts of your meeting matter, so ask a lawyer where you are if the stakes are high.

In most places it is legal to record a meeting you take part in, provided the people in it know or agree. What changes from place to place is who has to agree: in some, your own consent is enough; in others, everyone in the meeting must say yes. Privacy laws also govern what you do with it afterwards.

Three questions decide almost every case:

  1. Are you in the meeting? Recording a conversation you are not part of, without anyone's consent, is a crime in nearly every country covered here.
  2. Where is everyone? On a call, the strictest rule among the participants' locations is the one to plan for.
  3. Who is recording, a person or a business? A business that records people usually has data protection duties on top of the consent rule.

One-party consent means a recording is lawful if at least one person in the conversation agrees, and that person can be you. All-party consent, often called two-party consent, means every person in the conversation must agree. A meeting with people in both kinds of place should follow the all-party rule.

One-party consentAll-party consent
Who must agreeOne participant (you count)Every participant
Secret recording by a participantUsually lawfulUsually unlawful
ExamplesUS federal law, New York, Texas, CanadaCalifornia, Florida, Washington
Safe habitStill tell peopleAnnounce it and get a yes

Some all-party states focus on secrecy rather than a spoken yes. In Massachusetts, Montana and Washington, recording openly, with everyone aware, is generally treated as consent.

Federal law is one-party: 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d) lets a participant record unless the purpose is a crime or a tort. States can be stricter, and about a dozen are. California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington require everyone's consent, and four more add wrinkles.

StateRuleWhat to know
CaliforniaAll partiesPenal Code 632 covers confidential conversations; civil damages of $5,000 per violation under section 637.2
FloridaAll partiesSection 934.03; does not cover talk with no reasonable expectation of privacy
IllinoisAll parties720 ILCS 5/14-2 covers private conversations
MarylandAll partiesCourts and Judicial Proceedings 10-402
MassachusettsAll partiesChapter 272, section 99 targets secret recording
MontanaAll partiesSection 45-8-213: recording without the knowledge of all parties
New HampshireAll partiesRSA 570-A:2
PennsylvaniaAll partiesCovers in-person talk where people expect privacy, and all phone calls
WashingtonAll partiesRCW 9.73.030; a recorded announcement counts as consent
ConnecticutMixedAll parties for phone calls (civil liability), one party in person
NevadaMixedAll parties for phone calls, one party in person
DelawareUnclearTwo statutes conflict; follow the all-party one
OregonMixedOne party for phone calls; everyone must be told before an in-person conversation is recorded

Sources: the Reporters Committee recording guide for each state, and the Ninth Circuit's 2025 en banc decision in Project Veritas v. Schmidt, which upheld Oregon's notice rule. Checked October 2026.

Michigan is often listed too. Its courts disagree on whether a participant may record without consent, so asking first is the safer course there. California's Supreme Court has also applied California law to calls recorded from another state when the person on the other end was in California (Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006), which is why a mixed call should follow the stricter rule.

In the UK, a person may usually record a conversation they take part in for their own use without asking, but sharing it can still breach privacy or confidentiality. Organisations are held to more: under UK GDPR they need a lawful basis to record people and must tell them it is happening and why.

The Information Commissioner's Office lists six lawful bases, and consent is only one of them. Many businesses rely on legitimate interests for recording calls and meetings. Whichever basis you use, people must be told before recording starts, including the purpose, how long you keep it and their rights. Checked October 2026.

What does GDPR require for recording meetings in the EU?

Under the GDPR, a recording of identifiable people is personal data. A business recording a meeting needs a lawful basis under Article 6 and must tell participants, under Article 13, who is recording, why, how long it is kept and how to object. Consent is one basis, not the only one.

National criminal law sits on top of the GDPR, and some EU countries are strict. Germany's Criminal Code (section 201) makes it an offence to record someone's privately spoken words without permission, even if you are in the conversation. If anyone in the meeting is in the EU, announce the recording, explain the purpose in the invite or at the start, and give people a way to say no. Checked October 2026.

India has no single statute that stops you recording a conversation you are part of, but the Supreme Court recognised privacy as a fundamental right in 2017. Businesses also face the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, which requires a clear notice and specific consent before personal data, including voice recordings, is processed.

The government notified the DPDP Rules on 14 November 2025 with an 18-month phase-in, so most duties, including the notice rules, are due to apply from May 2027. The government has discussed bringing that date forward, so check the current position. For now, tell people a meeting is recorded, say why, and record the yes. Checked October 2026.

What are the recording rules in Canada and Australia?

Canada is one-party: Criminal Code section 184 allows interception with the consent of the sender or the intended recipient, so a participant can record. Australia varies by state: Victoria and Queensland let a participant record a private conversation, while New South Wales and most others generally need everyone's consent.

Canada. Businesses also fall under privacy law (PIPEDA federally, with separate laws in Quebec, British Columbia and Alberta), which expects people to be told why a call or meeting is recorded before it starts.

Australia. Victoria's Surveillance Devices Act 1999, section 6 only bans recording a private conversation "to which the person is not a party" without consent. New South Wales, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania generally require all parties' consent, with narrow exceptions such as protecting your lawful interests. Phone calls also fall under the federal Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. With a mixed Australian team, get everyone's agreement. Checked October 2026.

Can you record a work meeting?

Usually, if your company allows it and the consent rule where people sit is met. In one-party places, an employee can often lawfully record a meeting they attend, but company policy may still forbid it, and breaking that policy can cost you your job. Employers recording staff should put it in a written policy and announce it.

For employers, a recording of an employee is personal data in the UK, the EU, Canada and India, so the notice duties above apply. In US all-party states, an employer still needs everyone's consent, and a clear policy plus an on-screen notice is the usual way to show it. For interviews, there are also hiring record rules; our guide to recording interviews covers them.

Do Zoom, Google Meet and Teams tell people a meeting is recorded?

Yes. All three warn participants when their built-in recording starts. Zoom shows a consent prompt where people choose to stay or leave, Google Meet notifies everyone when recording starts or stops, and Microsoft Teams notifies every participant as soon as recording begins. These notices help, but they are not proof that each person agreed.

PlatformWhat participants seeSource
ZoomA recording consent prompt: click OK to stay, or Leave to opt out; phone callers hear an audio noticeZoom Support
Google MeetA notification when recording starts or stopsGoogle Meet Help
Microsoft TeamsA notification in the desktop, web or mobile app when recording startsMicrosoft Support

Checked October 2026. Recording with a separate app, a browser extension or a phone on the desk does not trigger these notices, so you have to say it yourself.

Yes, under the same consent rules as any other recording. A note taker that joins as a visible participant shows up in the attendee list under its own name, which tells people a tool is listening and gives them a chance to object. That is notice. In all-party places you still want a clear yes from everyone.

Good practice with any AI note taker:

  • Name it in the invite. "A note taker will record and transcribe this call."
  • Say it out loud in the first minute, and repeat it when someone joins late.
  • Let the host remove it. If anyone objects, take the bot out and write notes by hand.
  • Check where data goes. Ask the vendor whether it trains AI models on your calls and how long it keeps them.

Lynkk's meeting bot joins Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls as a visible participant, and Lynkk does not train AI models on your conversations. The Mac app and Chrome extension record without a bot in the call, so announce those recordings yourself.

Ask at the start, before anything substantive is said, in plain words: say that you would like to record, why, who will see it, and ask if everyone is fine with that. Wait for a yes from each person, note it, and stop recording if anyone says no. Put the same line in the calendar invite.

A short script you can read out:

"Before we start, I'd like to record this call so I can take accurate notes. The recording and transcript stay with [me / our team] and won't be shared outside it. Is everyone OK with that? If you'd rather not, say so now and I'll take notes by hand."

Then:

  1. Get each person's answer. Silence is weaker evidence than a yes, especially in all-party states.
  2. Say it once the recording is running, so the consent is on the recording itself. Washington law treats a recorded announcement as consent.
  3. Repeat it for late joiners, and put a line in the chat.
  4. Write it in the invite for recurring meetings, so nobody is surprised.

FAQ

Can you record a meeting without telling anyone?

In one-party places such as US federal law, New York or Canada, a participant can usually record secretly. In all-party states such as California, Florida and Washington, secret recording of a private conversation is generally illegal. Telling people is the safer habit everywhere.

Yes, if you follow the consent rule where the participants are. Zoom's built-in recording shows every participant a consent prompt, and anyone can leave instead of staying. A separate recorder or extension does not trigger that prompt, so announce the recording yourself and get a clear yes.

What if participants are in different states or countries?

Follow the strictest rule among everyone's locations. If one person is in California, Pennsylvania or the EU, plan for all-party consent and a clear notice. Courts can apply the stricter place's law, and California's Supreme Court did so for calls recorded from another state.

Often, but not always. In one-party places your own consent is enough anyway. In some all-party states, staying on a call after a clear announcement has been treated as consent, and Washington law accepts a recorded announcement. A spoken yes from each person is still the stronger record.

Yes, under the same consent rules as any recording. Lynkk's meeting bot joins as a visible participant so everyone can see it in the attendee list, and its Mac app and Chrome extension record with no bot. Whichever you use, announce the recording at the start of the call.

It depends on where you work. In US one-party states an employer that takes part can usually record, and in all-party states it needs everyone's consent. In the UK, EU, Canada and India, employers must also tell staff that recording happens, why, and how long recordings are kept.

No. This guide is general information, checked against the linked statutes, court decisions and regulator guidance in October 2026. Laws change and the facts of a meeting matter, so speak to a lawyer where you are before recording anything sensitive, such as legal, medical or employment matters.

Ask an AI to summarize this article

Keep reading

See every guide

Start remembering today

Everything your team says, in one memory.

Find context, get answers and keep moving.